Avukat vek\u00e2leten takip etmekte oldu\u011fu bir davada taraflara oranla \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi konumunda oldu\u011fundan g\u00f6revi nedeniyle \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi hususlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tan\u0131kl\u0131k etmek zorunda olup (Kuru, B.; Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc, Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Bask\u0131, Cilt 3, 2001, s. 2574), tan\u0131k olarak dinlenilmesinde de yasal engel bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Nitekim Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu’nun 24.06.2020 Tarihli 2017\/2-2209 E. ve 2020\/475 K. Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131<\/strong>nda; ”Daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vekilinin delil listesinde yer alan ayn\u0131 zamanda vekili olan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n yasal olarak dinlenilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu, bu tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n da di\u011fer tan\u0131klar gibi HMK\u2019nin 240. ve devam\u0131 maddeleri gere\u011fince dinlenilmesi gerekti\u011fi, aksi durumda esasen hukuki dinlenilme ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlaline sebebiyet verilmi\u015f olunaca\u011f\u0131, savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanaca\u011f\u0131 a\u015fik\u00e2rd\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca yarg\u0131laman\u0131n ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi safhalar ile dosyada mevcut bilgi ve belgelerin de\u011ferlendirilmesi sonucu delil listesinde yer alan bu tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n dinlenilmesi talebinin davay\u0131 uzatma amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenlerle daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 dinlenilip t\u00fcm deliller birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek sonucu uyar\u0131nca bir karar verilmesi gerekmektedir.” \u015feklindeki i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ile avukat\u0131n vekili oldu\u011fu dosyada tan\u0131kl\u0131k yapabilece\u011fine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ilkesi gere\u011fince taraflar hakkaniyete uygun olarak yarg\u0131laman\u0131n t\u00fcm safhas\u0131 boyunca hak ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan e\u015fit \u015fartlara sahip olmal\u0131, bu ama\u00e7la da gerek taleplerini ifade ederken gerekse iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n\u0131 ispata yarar delillerini sunarken taraflara ayn\u0131 imk\u00e2nlar tan\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r. HMK’n\u0131n \u0130spat\u0131n Konusu ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 m.187’de \u0130spat\u0131n konusunu taraflar\u0131n \u00fczerinde anla\u015famad\u0131klar\u0131 ve uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde etkili olabilecek \u00e7eki\u015fmeli vak\u0131alar\u0131n olu\u015fturdu\u011fu ve bu vak\u0131alar\u0131n ispat\u0131 i\u00e7in delil g\u00f6sterilebilece\u011fi ve HMK’n\u0131n \u0130spat Hakk\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 m.189’da Taraflar\u0131n, kanunda belirtilen s\u00fcre ve usule uygun olarak ispat hakk\u0131na sahip olduklar\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Taraflar\u00a0iddias\u0131n\u0131 ispatlayabilmek i\u00e7in HMK 240 ve devam\u0131 maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f usule uygun \u015fekilde tan\u0131k deliline dayanabilir.Davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131 davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131d\u0131r. Avukat davan\u0131n taraf\u0131 de\u011fil yarg\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde ki\u015filerin haklar\u0131n\u0131 savunmay\u0131 meslek edinmi\u015f, yarg\u0131n\u0131n kurucu unsurlar\u0131ndan olan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z savunman\u0131n serbest temsilcisidir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla avukat\u0131n vekil olarak g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu bir davada tan\u0131k olarak dinlenmesi usul ve yasaya uygundur.<\/p>\n Ancak, bu durum mesleki s\u0131r saklama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, tarafs\u0131zl\u0131k ilkesi ve \u00e7\u0131kar \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 gibi etik ve mesleki s\u0131n\u0131rlamalara tabidir. Avukat\u0131n tan\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda, m\u00fcvekkilinin \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131 korumas\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 zamanda do\u011fruyu s\u00f6ylemesi \u00f6nemlidir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Avukat vek\u00e2leten takip etmekte oldu\u011fu bir davada taraflara oranla \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi konumunda oldu\u011fundan g\u00f6revi nedeniyle \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi hususlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tan\u0131kl\u0131k etmek zorunda olup (Kuru, B.; Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc, Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Bask\u0131, Cilt 3, 2001, s. 2574), tan\u0131k olarak dinlenilmesinde de yasal engel bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Nitekim Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu’nun 24.06.2020 Tarihli 2017\/2-2209 E. ve 2020\/475 K. Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda;…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"image","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6511","post","type-post","status-publish","format-image","hentry","category-genel","post_format-post-format-image"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6511","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6511"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6511\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6517,"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6511\/revisions\/6517"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6511"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6511"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6511"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}