{"id":6386,"date":"2023-03-22T20:00:08","date_gmt":"2023-03-22T17:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/?p=6386"},"modified":"2026-01-18T02:58:01","modified_gmt":"2026-01-17T23:58:01","slug":"davadan-feragat-davanin-geri-alinmasi-davayi-takipten-sarfinazar-etmek-davayi-takipten-vazgecmek-davanin-atiye-birakilmasi-kavramlari-ne-ifade-eder","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/?p=6386","title":{"rendered":"DAVADAN FERAGAT, DAVANIN GER\u0130 ALINMASI (DAVAYI TAK\u0130PTEN SARFINAZAR ETMEK, DAVAYI TAK\u0130PTEN VAZGE\u00c7MEK, DAVANIN AT\u0130YE BIRAKILMASI) KAVRAMLARI NE \u0130FADE EDER"},"content":{"rendered":"

DAVANIN GER\u0130 ALINMASI, DAVADAN FERAGAT VE DAVAYI TAK\u0130PS\u0130Z BIRAKMAK KAVRAMLARININ KISACA A\u00c7IKLANDI\u011eI, \u00d6ZELL\u0130KLE DAVANIN GER\u0130 ALINMASI VE DAVADAN FERAGAT KAVRAMLARININ FARKLI KAVRAMLAR OLDU\u011eU, B\u0130RB\u0130R\u0130 \u0130LE KARI\u015eTIRILMAMASI GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130 KONUSUNDA A\u00c7IKLAYICI OLAN\u00a0 YARGITAY KARARI :<\/p>\n
\n

YARGITAY<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Hukuk Dairesi<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Esas No: 2014\/37478<\/p>\n

    Karar No: 2016\/9244<\/p>\n

    Karar Tarihi: 13.04.2016<\/p>\n

    YARGITAY KARARI<\/p>\n

    …<\/p>\n

    E) Gerek\u00e7e:<\/p>\n

    1- …<\/p>\n

    2- Davac\u0131 vekili, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, genel tatil \u00fccreti ve hafta tatili \u00fccreti taleplerini atiye terk etti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015f, mahkemece bu talepler hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

    Dava, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 yeni HMK d\u00f6neminde a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

    Somut olaya ge\u00e7meden \u00f6nce, davan\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131, davadan feragat ve davay\u0131 takipsiz b\u0131rakmak kavramlar\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131saca a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131nda fayda vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

    Davan\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve davadan feragat kavramlar\u0131 farkl\u0131 kavramlar olup, birbiri ile kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n

    1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK’nun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemde, uygulamada davan\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 kavram\u0131 yerine, davay\u0131 takipten sarf\u0131nazar etmek, davay\u0131 takipten vazge\u00e7mek, “davan\u0131n atiye b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131” tabirleri de kullan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davan\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131, ileride tekrar dava a\u00e7abilme hakk\u0131n\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutarak davan\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131d\u0131r. Burada, davac\u0131 talep etti\u011fi haktan (talep sonucundan) feragat etmemektedir. Davadan feragat ise talep edilen haktan, talep sonucundan vazge\u00e7mektir. Davan\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’nun 123 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinde, davadan feragat ise 307 nci maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Davadan feragat daval\u0131n\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131na (muvafakat\u0131na) ba\u011fl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131 geri alabilmesi i\u00e7in daval\u0131n\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131 \u015fartt\u0131r. Davan\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 durumunda dava hi\u00e7 a\u00e7\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r ve mahkemece “karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na” dair karar verilir. Davadan feragat halinde ise davan\u0131n reddine karar verilir. Davan\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 durumunda, geri alma an\u0131na kadar edinilen izlenime g\u00f6re, haks\u0131z oldu\u011funa kanaat getirilen tarafa vekalet \u00fccreti ve yarg\u0131lama giderleri y\u00fcklenir. Davadan feragat halinde, feragat edilen hak ileride tekrar dava konusu yap\u0131lamaz, yap\u0131l\u0131r ise mahkemece feragat nedeniyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilir. Davan\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 durumunda ise, geri al\u0131nan dava ileride tekrar a\u00e7\u0131labilir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131 geri almas\u0131na daval\u0131 r\u0131za g\u00f6stermemi\u015fse, davaya devam edilmeli ve talep hakk\u0131nda esastan bir karar verilmelidir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131 geri alabilmesi i\u00e7in daval\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131na ihtiya\u00e7 vard\u0131r. Z\u0131mni muvafakat yeterli de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle, davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131 geri almas\u0131na r\u0131za g\u00f6sterip g\u00f6stermedi\u011fi daval\u0131ya sorulmal\u0131, daval\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a geri almaya r\u0131za g\u00f6sterir (muvafakat verirse) ise ona g\u00f6re i\u015flem yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

    Davan\u0131n takipsiz b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 (davan\u0131n m\u00fcracaata b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131), davadan feragat ve davan\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131ndan farkl\u0131 olup, davan\u0131n m\u00fcracaata b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in daval\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne veya r\u0131zas\u0131na gerek yoktur, m\u00fcracaata b\u0131rak\u0131lan dava yenileninceye kadar (\u00fc\u00e7 ayl\u0131k s\u00fcre boyunca) dava varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 korumaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

    Yukar\u0131da da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, uygulamada ve \u00f6zellikle avukatlar aras\u0131nda, davan\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 yerine davan\u0131n atiye b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 tabiri kullan\u0131lmakta olup, bu tabirin hukuki a\u00e7\u0131dan hi\u00e7bir h\u00fckm\u00fc yoktur.<\/p>\n

    G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, davadan feragat ile davan\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 birbirinden \u00e7ok farkl\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenle, yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n hangi tabirleri kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n, davac\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131n\u0131n (maksad\u0131n\u0131n) davaya konu haktan (talep sonucundan) vazge\u00e7mek mi oldu\u011fu yoksa davas\u0131n\u0131 ileride tekrar a\u00e7abilme hakk\u0131n\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutarak davas\u0131n\u0131 geri almak m\u0131 oldu\u011fu mahkemece davac\u0131ya a\u00e7\u0131klatt\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131 sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n

    Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta, davac\u0131 fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, genel tatil \u00fccreti ve hafta tatili \u00fccretlerini atiye terk etti\u011fini beyan etmi\u015fse de amac\u0131n\u0131n, meram\u0131n\u0131n davay\u0131 geri almak m\u0131 oldu\u011fu yoksa davadan feragat m\u0131 oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klatt\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkemece, bu husus davac\u0131ya sorulmal\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131n\u0131n davay\u0131 geri almak oldu\u011fu saptand\u0131ktan sonra, davan\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131na daval\u0131n\u0131n (daval\u0131lar\u0131n) r\u0131za g\u00f6sterip g\u00f6stermedi\u011fi (muvafakat verip vermedi\u011fi) daval\u0131lardan ya da vekillerinden sorularak sonucuna g\u00f6re s\u00f6z konusu talepler hakk\u0131nda bir karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n

    Yukar\u0131daki usul i\u015flemleri tamamlanmadan, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, genel tatil \u00fccreti ve hafta tatili \u00fccreti talepleri hakk\u0131nda karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verilmesi isabetsizdir.<\/p>\n

    F) Sonu\u00e7:<\/p>\n

    Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 sebeplerden dolay\u0131 BOZULMASINA, bozma sebebine g\u00f6re sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n bu a\u015famada incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde ilgiliye iadesine, 13\/04\/2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    DAVANIN GER\u0130 ALINMASI, DAVADAN FERAGAT VE DAVAYI TAK\u0130PS\u0130Z BIRAKMAK KAVRAMLARININ KISACA A\u00c7IKLANDI\u011eI, \u00d6ZELL\u0130KLE DAVANIN GER\u0130 ALINMASI VE DAVADAN FERAGAT KAVRAMLARININ FARKLI KAVRAMLAR OLDU\u011eU, B\u0130RB\u0130R\u0130 \u0130LE KARI\u015eTIRILMAMASI GEREKT\u0130\u011e\u0130 KONUSUNDA A\u00c7IKLAYICI OLAN\u00a0 YARGITAY KARARI : YARGITAY Hukuk Dairesi Esas No: 2014\/37478 Karar No: 2016\/9244 Karar Tarihi: 13.04.2016 YARGITAY KARARI … E) Gerek\u00e7e: 1- … 2- Davac\u0131 vekili,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"image","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[87],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-image","hentry","category-ozel","post_format-post-format-image"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6386","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6386"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6386\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6401,"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6386\/revisions\/6401"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alpkagan.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}